It has been almost a month now, and still there is no easy way for me to form a coherent narrative around those days.
It should have been easier. I may live somewhere else, but it is Bombay that is home still. But I cannot look back easily on what was there before. The strength of my reminiscing is always in a casual poesy, a sense of humour, a great deal of true affection. And, most importantly, in a sense of certainty; certainty in the past, certainty in elements of the present, certain hope for the future.
It is difficult to explain why that certainty has been lost, but let me confess: when it was over, when the news finally said that there were no more of that particular group of terrorists at large, when the possibility of further horror was beginning to recede, when we were all beginning to look around and find that the world had actually turned while we waited, I finally started to cry. I wept intermittently for hours, physically unable to stop, after 62 hours of being unable to sleep, eat, work, or breathe without a subconscious awareness that something terrible was happening, and that it felt as though it was happening in my head, assaulting reason itself. And I said, for the first time ever, in the midst of that weeping, that I do not want to bring a child into a world so terrifyingly out of control.
Even as I write this, I realise how silly it sounds, how it could almost be pretentious. Ultimately, by the usual ways in which we measure how distant or how close horror is to us, what happened in the southernmost parts of Mumbai between the night of 26 November and the morning of 29 November has not even been a cut on my finger. I have lost no family, no close friends, no actual physical security, and I am truly grateful for this, even while feeling guilt at that gratefulness.
Yet I feel a grief and a terror so potent. When we switched channels to the news that night and saw what was happening, when we watched for hours, trying to make sense of it and failing, when we woke the next morning to find that it had not yet ended, when we kept watching as it refused to end, when our eyelids drooped but could not close in relief--it hurt and maimed and held us all hostage. And until it ended, it felt as though everything was out of control, that we might wake to find something else unimaginable had happened.
Indeed this was unimaginable. You can argue that the city has been no stranger to terrorist attacks, to blood, to guns. But none were employed quite in this way. My mother and my great-uncle walked out of a bank a decade ago as a politician was gunned down by mobsters on the road in front of them, in broad daylight; yet, as my mother said, they did not even aim to shoot anyone else, they did not extend their quarrel indiscriminately.
There have been bombs in our trains, in our buses, on our roads--the terror of those has been awful and those hurt or killed have suffered terribly, but the poor comfort was always that in a few minutes, it was always over, and then the city could take control again, people trying to help in any way possible. Let us not underestimate the power of that agency to heal--we take our courage from our capacity to act. The agony of an hour is considerably different from the torture of a day, or two days, or three, during which we try to help but know that there is always more happening than we can handle.
And if there were guns, there are also people pulling the triggers. There have been plans like this before; a plan like this was laid and then dropped at the time of the 1993 bomb blasts. It was dropped because those who had to pull the triggers lost the peculiar sort of courage required for murder by a means more direct than bombs they did not have to watch going off; in fact, it is even possible that they lost their nerve much earlier, and avoided bombing more strategic targets that would have resulted in far greater and more widespread destruction. Whether their consciences saved us all from worse, or whether they invented those consciences for a measure of mercy is a moot point. But to have that power to kill indiscriminately and watch your victim fall, is to feel a level of intent far beyond what most of us can imagine, a level of intent that is possibly beyond reason and logic. Hatred, blood lust, the desire for destruction--where do they come from? Who are these people and how could they do this? Why do this? Why us? What can we do now, what can we possibly do?
These questions are old ones. When we first heard, I know what I said, almost unthinkingly; these things don't happen in Bombay; maybe they happen in Kashmir. I said it so easily, and only realised what I was saying several hours later. The tragedy of this, the tragedy of November 26, 27, 28, and 29 in Bombay, in south Bombay, in Colaba and on Marine Drive, in Fort and around Victoria Terminus, is that what happened to us is not at all unimaginable; it was and has been reality, history, memory for too many in other places. This is one reason why I wept; this is why people were angry; this is why the world was outraged. We know it is imaginable. We just do not imagine it in some places; we do not imagine it in our homes.

A porter and his handcart, at VT station, BombayYou can call south Bombay posh, but if you do that, you would ignore the fact that across from VT station in Bazaargate lies one of the densest populations in the Fort area; that down the road from the Taj is a fishing village and a slum, certainly stuffed into the corner, but existing nonetheless; that VT is a point of transit for commuters and travellers of all social and economic classes, many of whom live or work in the area; that everyone and their uncle goes to Marine Drive and the Gateway of India for a look at the sea, a walk, a sit-down on a tetrapod or the sea wall, and a curious gawk at five star hotels, huge office towers, and expensive residential buildings; that the people living just north of Metro cinema on Girgaum and Kalbadevi Roads are the same ordinary people you will meet in the BEST bus any given day; that the hawkers on Colaba Causeway are middle class and working class men; that Cama and Albless Hospital is, after all, a charitable institution; that the people who work at the five star hotels are trying to make a living. This was not and has never been a gated community of the rich. This is India, still unequal on the whole, but remarkably more equal and far less petty-minded than it often is. These spaces are public; they belong to all of us in some way or another; we all go to these spaces at some time or another, whoever we may be. This is a city, an idea of what our cities could potentially be, imperfect, yet wonderfully sane in unexpected ways.
For me, this is home; where you know and understand what is around you, where you are rarely uncomfortable or insecure, where you can return and still feel a pull of pleasure in familiarity, where you want to be when you are miserable, where you feel justified in criticism and mean that criticism only for constructive purposes, where you want only the best to happen, where you are rarely lonely, where you can sense the motivations of those around you, where you are certain of a sense of belonging. And which you often take for granted, and love the more when you are separated from its comforts.
When they walked in with their guns and their grenades, they walked into my home. I wept and wondered why and prayed to a god I am no longer sure of that nobody would have to feel the blankness, the fear and the sorrow, the sense that the way in which I understand my life has shattered irreparably. When I say I want no child, it is because I cannot yet imagine subconsciously another place that would be home in quite that way and that would not be vulnerable in quite that way; and I want to bring forth no child to grow up in a world so fundamentally cracked.
The strange thing, the tragic thing, is that there is no doubt my every thought that long night, for it was like one long night that stretched on and on, was not unique. These have doubtless been the thoughts of millions before, millions even as I write this. Our horrors take different forms, our homes do too. Those questions about hatred and blood lust and wanton destruction, and about where they have come from, have been asked before. They have been asked, no doubt, in Bombay itself; it was still called Bombay in December 1992 and January 1993. I was a child then; I knew that something terrible had happened, that a mosque had been demolished (a truly terrible thing in and of itself, I knew), that there were riots (I heard both stories and screaming), and that things could not be the same ever again. But I did not understand then as a child as I do now, as an adult who cannot help but think in terms of reason and rationality and responsibility.
And perhaps the greatest tragedy is that when I think that those questions do not have to lead to more hatred, I know that this amounts to too difficult a philosophy to truly adopt, except in theory; that practice is different and too complex to comprehend, though it must be attempted; that such simplicity cannot ineffably work without causing more pain in a world already torn into bits and thrown into the wind.
It is not that I am only afraid of people who might take me within a collective target, or of their guns, or their bombs, or their grenades. We are all, every one of us, in the dark; I am far more afraid of the dark.
-----
The Taj Mahal Palace Hotel, 16 December 2008I came home ten days ago. and roamed much of south Mumbai, showing a friend around on her first visit to the city. I was almost afraid that I would feel distanced, a difficult but potent defence mechanism, but was relieved to find that did not happen. Whatever has happened, I still feel implicated in this environment, geographical, cultural, social, political. A strange relief, because it is no relief at all.
I was not afraid when I walked the streets of Colaba, of Fort, of Churchgate. My first dazzled memories of a public space in the larger city are of the Taj Mahal Hotel and the Gateway of India, and I have watched countless other children of all social classes, economic classes, religions, and regional communities look up in awe at first one structure and then the other; it was oddly heartening to see that people were still bringing their children to see the Taj and the Gateway, though the focus had definitely shifted from the stone arch to the graceful old stone building. VT was running on in its usual chaos, of people, and luggage, and Neo-Gothic stone pillars, with considerable number of policemen thrown in. My heart ached to see that there were far fewer people than before camped out with their baggage and their bedding in the waiting hall; those people were the first to be hit. Some fell, some ran, leaving behind baggage, bedding, blood, their dead kin.
I was still not afraid as I walked up the road towards the Metro Cinema junction, but as I went past the gate of Cama Hospital, an old short cut taken often in student days, I began to feel sick, so terribly sick. The city was moving on, with so much security that the old Portuguese sea-fort down the road from where I grew up was suddenly off-limits to everyone, a policeman forbade me from taking pictures of VT, and getting into a five star hotel required more checks than getting into the airport. The city was moving on with a painful resilience not born out of inherent courage but out of economic necessity.
But what has happened has happened, and we are all still in the dark.
-----
A rickshaw driver in Bangalore told me, in the first few days of December, that it was no use to weep; that when the darkness came down, all we could do was look to the people who had been so brave and had saved and helped other victims of the attacks, especially those who had lost their own lives trying to save others. They are, he said, like stars in the sky now.
A passerby gazes at a photograph of a mourner at ATs Chief Hemant Karkare's funeral, part of an exhibition at the Pavement Gallery, Kala Ghoda, Bombay,
to mark the one-month anniversary of the attacksA few days ago, I was at the NCPA for a concert of Christmas carols, at the end of which the audience was invited to join in and sing "Silent Night." Two or three buildings down Marine Drive, the Trident had reopened just that day, with a multi-religious prayer service, and a kilometer away, the Taj had reopened as well. Out on Marine Drive, a crowd had gathered to look into the Trident and spontaneously applaud and cheer every now and then. The Jews of Bombay had that evening lit the first lamps of Hanukkah, the festival of light, even as they came to terms with their own grief and fear as a community over what happened in the Chabad House. As the auditorium reverberated with the sound of several hundred people singing softly, I turned, trying to blink back tears without showing my cousin that I was crying. Three seats to my right, an elderly lady was wiping her eyes, and a row ahead, another lady was crying freely. I turned further behind; it was obvious that there were many people crying. Perhaps it was sorrow; perhaps it was relief; perhaps it was just sentimentality.
For me, the tears came because despite everything, despite the darkness, music, such beautiful, angelic, harmonious music, was still possible.

A balloon seller and her friend look through the pavement exhibition of photos on Mumbai's four days of terror
It is late at night now, the wee hours of Christmas morning. A couple of hours ago, my mother told me to take a box out of the cupboard; it was the box that held the three little Baby Jesus statues that would have to be added to her decorations, to be put in the places left empty for the hour of the blessed birth. I put them down, one by one--the littlest one, less than an inch long, with a scrunched up face, between the humble flaking Mary and Joseph; the bigger one, a black baby Jesus in the midst of an all-white cast of characters, Mary, Joseph, shepherds, angels, even sheep; the last one, his arms outstretched, lowered gently, into a rocking cradle.
I have understood something tonight about Christmas that I never understood before; it is odd that I only understand this in heart when I am a professed agnostic. To bring the baby forth, to lay him down in the manger; that is a sign and an action of hope and of possibility. I have done this mechanically, knowing it is only a symbolic gesture; yet, for some reason of meaning-making in my consciousness that I can't put into words, even in the surrounding darkness, the little baby brought me some hope, and it was like a little light, a very little light.
I can't know if it will last or if it will go out, but it was there, a precious little light.